Portless

iPhone 13 (2021), AirPods Studio, Apple Glass & more!

We don’t even have the iPhone 12 yet, but we already have some iPhone 13 leaks. Get those snacks ready as we’ll be covering the recent iPhone 13 Leaks, Apple Glasses updates, iPhone 12 updates, AirPods Studio Headphones and so much more!


iPhone 13

Another iPhone, another Camera Module

Another iPhone, another Camera Module

Starting off with the iPhone 13, Twitter leaker Fudge (@choco_bit), who’s been accurate in the past, claims that this is the supposed layout for the iPhone 13 (Right), which would be the 2021 iPhone. He did say that we should take this with a grain of salt, since these leaks are pre-event. So, this could indeed be something that Apple is considering for the iPhone 13 lineup, it’s just that it’s way too early to know for sure if Apple would indeed go down this route.

Regardless, this is our very first look into what could materialise into the iPhone 13 and as you can see, the back is quite a bit different now. We have four Camera Modules, compared to three on the iPhone 11/12. That LiDAR Sensor, from the iPhone 12, has now been moved underneath that four Camera Array. I would say that this does make a lot of sense. If Apple were to add another Module, they would preferably add it in that Triple Camera Array, where the LiDAR Module is currently sitting on the iPhone 12’s. This would be in order to have a consistent design, so the LiDAR Module would be moved somewhere outside of that Array.

Now, you’re probably wondering, what would that fourth Camera be for? Is it a Zoom Camera? Is it one of those strange Colour Filter Cameras that OnePlus added?

Well, it is way too early to know but my personal guess is that it is some sort of Periscope Telephoto Module, similar to what Huawei and Samsung have added. It may possibly be a 5x Optical Zoom Module or something along those lines.The likelihood with a Module like that, is that you can only go from 1x to 5x, anything in between would just be Digital Zoom. However, if you keep the 2x Module and then add a 5x Module, you still retain a sharp Zoom Level in between the two. This is what I believe Apple would do, judging from this design leak.

Speaking of the Cameras, Fudge also tweeted some details about the iPhone 13 Camera System and according to him, the iPhone 13’s model number is D6x and the Main Camera would be a 64MP Module with 6x Digital Zoom. Others have done this in the past. Samsung is a very good example, they added a very high Megapixel count to their Smartphones but as a result, Low-Light Performance was affected negatively. They started having Focusing issues so, as long as you have a tiny Smartphone Sensor, adding more Pixels would just make those Pixels smaller as there’s finite room inside the Smartphone Sensor. Because of this, they would capture less light. This is why Apple is one of the last Smartphone manufacturers that kept the (now) low-res 12MP Sensor, because the lower the MP count, the bigger the Pixels are and the better the Camera is in Low-Light. Anyway, that’s just the Main Module.

Then we would have a 40MP Ultra-Wide Angle Module and a 40MP Telephoto Module with 3-5x Optical Zoom, like I was assuming, with a 15-20x Digital Zoom. These are very likely possibilities. Probably not so much in terms of the the Ultra-Wide Module as it’s already pretty bad in Low-Light, an increase in Megapixel count would just make it worse. But the Telephoto Module would benefit a lot from an increased Megapixel count.

Finally, the fourth Module would actually not be a 2x Telephoto. According to Fudge, it would be a 64MP Anamorphic Lens. So, a 2.1:1 Aspect Ratio that would give you an incredibly wide and cinematic view, especially when shooting video. But, is there really any point in having that if we already have an Ultra-Wide Module? I would say no, and Fudge pretty much agrees. He does say that we should take this with a huge amount of salt. It’s extremely likely that his sources did tell him that these are things that Apple is currently considering doing, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that it will definitely happen. We can’t be sure of that just yet. Also, it seems that Jon Prosser disagrees. He says that the Camera layout of the iPhone 13 would be identical to the iPhone 12, something that ‘LoveToDream’, another accurate leaker, disagrees with. From my understanding, both LovetoDream and Fudge get their info from a Supply Chain source, whereas Jon Prosser gets his info from Apple’s own team, this is the reason why we have some conflicts here.

Given Apples’s history with recycling old designs, we wouldn’t expect any massive changes in that single year.

Given Apples’s history with recycling old designs, we wouldn’t expect any massive changes in that single year.

Aside from that, another change that could be coming to the iPhone 13 is the Notch. As you probably all know by now, the iPhone 12 will still have the Notch. It’s just that it would be smaller, thanks to the repositioning of the Earpiece. We’ve heard some rumors that Apple could be removing the Notch from the iPhone 13 entirely, with them being in favour of a Full-Screen Display. But, knowing Apple and how they like to keep a certain design for as long as possible, I don’t see them giving up on the iPhone 12”s front design after just one year. It would be cool, but I don’t think that’s happening in 2021.

But something that is happening in 2021, is Apple finally dropping Lightning from the iPhone! However, we would not be getting USB C, which we’ve been wanting for so many years now, but instead, the iPhone 13 would have a complete Wireless Charging solution. This means that we would have no Ports on the 2021 iPhone. Instead, we would be getting something that looks like a Smart Connector, which would allow you to connect a Magnetic Charging Cable and charge the iPhone like that. This would be very similar to how the Apple Watch charges.

Now, while that is pretty neat, USB C Charging would still be preferred. Otherwise, this would still be another extra cable that you would have to carry with you, which would be just as inconvenient as it is to carry the Lightning Cable now, when all of your other devices are USB C. But the thing is, this is looking extremely likely to happen.

Fudge reported that this is indeed happening but that you would be expected to charge the iPhone wirelessly instead. Ming-Chi-Kuo has reported the exact same thing and Jon Prosser has also mentioned this as well. They are all saying that one Portless iPhone will be coming next year and that Apple will never add USB C to their iPhones. Bloomberg also reported a similar thing. That Apple will be removing the lighting connector from at least one of their iPhones, in 2021. These are four sources with a very good track-record, all reporting the exact same thing. So, it’s looking quite likely that at least one iPhone 13 would be going fully wireless next year.

So, there you go, that’s how the iPhone 13 is shaping up. This completely wireless iPhone with the same frame as the iPhone 12, possibly the same exact Notch and likely some Camera improvements, which will be focused on the Zoom functionality that is currently lacking.


iPhone 12

When it comes to this year’s iPhone, the iPhone 12, we do have some fresh updates. According to Ming-Chi-Kuo, the iPhone 12’s would not come with Headphones inside the box anymore, in order for Apple to sell more AirPods.

That does make a lot of sense, especially considering the price leaks that Jon Prosser has posted. According to Jon, the 5.4” iPhone 12, which would be the lowest-end model, would start from $650. It will come with an OLED Display, the new A14 Processor and a Dual Camera Module. That’s an insanely low price for new iPhones. The 6.1” iPhone 12 Max would cost $750, followed by the 6.1” iPhone 12 Pro, which could cost $1000, followed by the 6.7” iPhone 12 Pro Max, which would cost $1100.

After the $400 iPhone SE, it seems that the base iPhone 12 is also on the more affordable side.

After the $400 iPhone SE, it seems that the base iPhone 12 is also on the more affordable side.

Aside from the Camera Modules and the Stainless Steel build, the regular iPhone 12’s would still come with all the features that the Pro models come with. Meaning that there hasn’t been a year when Apple had a better iPhone line-up. They obviously had to make some trade-offs to keep that price low and it seems like one of these would be not including Headphones. Unfortunately, one of the other trade-offs would be the lack of any high Refresh Rate Display.

There have been a ton of conflicting reports on this, with some saying that it would have a 120Hz Display, and some saying that it would not. Long story short, according to Display Analyst Ross Young, Apple wants to include an LTPO OLED Display on the iPhone 12’s so that they can dynamically adjust the Refresh Rate from 1Hz, all the way up to 120Hz. This is just like what they’re doing on the iPad Pro, but keep in mind that the iPad Pro has an LCD Display, not an OLED.

Samsung does have 120Hz Displays for Smartphones but the Refresh Rate is fixed. This is what Samsung has been using on their own S20 line and while they’re good, the Battery Life just isn’t that great, at least not on the Exynos models. Samsung will indeed have a 120Hz LTPO OLED Panel this year but according to Ross, they are reserving it for the Galaxy Note 20 and the Galaxy Fold 2.

Apple will only be allowed to use it next year, in 2021. Which means that this year, they will have to choose between a great Battery Life and a constant 120Hz Display, it seems like they’re not choosing the 120Hz at all this year. This is mostly everything new, when it comes to the iPhone 12. 


AirPods Studio

Next up, we have some quick updates on the next-gen AirPods.

So, Jon Prosser mentioned back in May that Apple will be releasing some new over-ear Headphones, just like the Beats Solo’s or Studio. However, rather than calling these the new Beats Studio, they will be marketing these as AirPods. Which means that we would now have three variants of the AirPods. The entry level models, the AirPods Pro and these new AirPods Studio, which are codenamed B515 and will start at $350, according to Jon

Be sure to check out our second Instagram account (@ZONEofCONCEPTS) for more concepts like this one!

Be sure to check out our second Instagram account (@ZONEofCONCEPTS) for more concepts like this one!

Mark Gurman from Bloomberg released a massive report, with a ton of inside details on the new AirPods studio. According to Mark, Apple is actually working on two AirPods Studio models, a premium version with leather-like fabrics and a fitness focused model that uses lighter, breathable materials. The headband is said to be very thin, with full metal arms. Not only that, but Mark says that the ear-pads would be magnetic and that you can indeed replace them with different designs when you wish. This design would allow you to go from fitness mode to ‘pro mode’ so to say, whenever you want. Now, I’m not sure to what extent these ear-cups would be modular, since they do have a lot of tech inside and you can just buy more of these, as it would be quite pricey. I think it’s just the material surrounding it that would be modular and replaceable. 

This is how we’ve modelled our concept (Above) and we decided to base these off of the leaked iOS 14 icon. We’ve made these gigantic ear-cups, held in place by a fairly thin headband. We do have invisible touch controllers on the sides, which would allow you to adjust the volume, skip to the next song, skip to the previous song as well as invoke Siri, which you can also do by saying the magic keyword command.

At a price point of $350, Apple seems to be competing directly with Sony, Microsoft and Bose, with their line of high-end, Noise Cancelling Headphones. Sony is currently the king in this department, with their WH-1000WM3’s and I’m really curious to see if Apple can actually beat them in terms of Sound Quality and of course, Noise Cancelling. 

Personally, I’m not really into over-ear Headphones. I always find them to be way too big. They’re perfect on a plane but, aside from that, I would never use them. I do prefer in-ear Headphones, like the AirPods Pro, so do let me know down below, which team are you?


Apple Glass

Finally, just some quick updates on the Apple AR Glasses. In a previous video, I talked about those massive leaks from Jon Prosser. 

Jon Prosser also said that Apple is working on a circular version of their Glasses, which would be called the “Steve Jobs Heritage Edition” and they would be more premium and likely more expensive than the usual model. However, Mark Gurman calls this, and all of the leaks that Jon Prosser covered, as complete fiction.

All the patents we’ve sen so far point to something similar to the Oculus Quest, which we absolutely loved.

All the patents we’ve sen so far point to something similar to the Oculus Quest, which we absolutely loved.

Mark Gurman said that there are two devices in the works right now, rather than just one, this is what I’ve personally heard as well. One device is the mixed AR and VR Headset, similar to the Oculus Quest. This is called N301 according to Mark Gurman, it could be announced as early as 2021 (matching Jon’s report) and released in 2022. The other model would be those pure AR Glasses (N421), which would not launch until the end of 2022 or even 2023.

Now, we have seen a ton of Apple patents on both of these designs, but most of the patents seemed to show the Oculus Quest style Headset, rather than the true AR Glasses design that we’re all looking forward to. My guess is that it’s somewhere in between. The AR/VR Headset would launch in late 2021, like Jon reported, and then the actual AR Glasses would launch in 2022. These ones will need more tweaks, especially considering the insanely high Resolution Displays. These would be 8K Displays in each eye, if we’re going by CNET’s 2018 report on this.

So, there you go! We still have quite some time to wait until any of these come out, so do let me know, which of these products are you excited for the most?

The Portless iPhone!

In case you’re a bit confused as to why this article is titled The iPhone with no ports, well, that’s because Apple’s working on one and here’s everything that we know.


This article is pretty interesting because we’ll be covering the future of the iPhone and that future is indeed an iPhone that has no ports.  But why, how and when is this going to happen? Let’s first start with taking a look at Apple’s history when it comes to connectors. Back in 2003 when the Third Generation iPod was introduced, it also featured something quite innovative, which was Apple’s 30-pin dock connector. 

You might remember this from the old iPhones, but essentially this connector was way ahead of its time. It was a mechanical connector that locked into place and it was impossible to remove unless you were holding the two buttons on the side, so it was very secure. But what made this very unique was that it was a connector that combined multiple standards from data transfer, to audio, input controls for things such as changing the volume or the track and it also supported video output. 

A connector way ahead of its time.

A connector way ahead of its time.

This was extremely innovative for a connector that was released in 2003, albeit video support was only added in 2005 with the introduction of the iPod Video. Apple kept on using this connector on the iPhone, the iPad and all the iPods, up until 2012. Also, third-party manufactures were using the 30-pin connector heavily in accessories, such as like speakers, chargers and cars were even using it!

Then in 2012, like we said, Apple moved away from the 30-pin connector and launched something far superior, this was the Lightning connector. The Lightning connector was not only significantly smaller, but it was also reversible. It was the world’s first high end connector with the exact same pins on both the front and the back. Not only that, but it also improved the transfer speeds, while bumping the video output resolution to 1080p. 

However, many people were angry that Apple switched to Lightning, as their old accessories that they have acquired over the years, no longer worked. Apple did sell a 30 pin to lightning adapter, but for some reason people were still upset, even though Lightning was vastly superior to the old 30-pin dock. Soon after, accessory makers have started making accessories with the lightning port in mind. So we started seeing speakers, car mounts, docks and loads of others. 

However, 2012 was also when Bluetooth started taking off, meaning that most speakers also supported a Bluetooth connection and that you no longer had to physically connect your iPhone to the speakers in order for them to work. The same thing applied to cars, which started adding Bluetooth as well. Because of this, Lightning ended up being less widely used by accessory makers, compared to the 30-pin connector, when it came to audio accessories and docks. 

When Apple re-launched the 12” MacBook in 2015, something quite interesting happened. They removed all the ports and added a USB Type C port, the next generation USB port that, same as with Lightning, was fully reversible. Apple was actually one of the first technology manufactures to adopt USB type C.  This was the successor to the world famous USB type A ports that we’re all familiar with, but it was also the successor to microUSB, which is what loads of Smartphones used. 

USB-C, clearly a lot to handle for some.

USB-C, clearly a lot to handle for some.

USB C was also a much more beefed up version of Lightning, adding up to 100W of charging, USB 3.1 transfer speeds and 4K video output support all in a single small connector that was fully reversible. Shortly after, Apple started implementing USB C heavily. In 2016, when they launched the 4th generation MacBook Pro, they removed all the ports, with the exception of the Headphone Jack and replaced them with 4 USB type C ports. These ports were even more special that what the 12” MacBook from a year before had, this was because they also featured Thunderbolt 3. The transfer speeds were now 40Gb/s, up from the 10Gb/s that we had with USB C. 

So, in 2017 when Apple was readying up to launch the innovative iPhone X, everyone was expecting Apple to now switch from lightning to USB C, especially that around that time, we also started seeing smartphones implementing USB C. The whole idea was perfect. Having one connector, one single charger that you would use with any device (laptop, camera, smartphone). But, when the iPhone X launched, to the surprise of many people*, it still had Apple’s lightning port. 

Luckily, Apple did indeed add wireless charging, which Android phones have had for many years now but Apple finally did add it with the iPhone X and 8. These were both announced at the same event but USB C was nowhere to be found. In 2018, Apple launched the iPhone X equivalent to the iPad. The 3rd generation iPad Pro, which, just like the iPhone X, had no home button anymore. It had a full screen display with a full gesture based navigation system and FaceID.  With this massive change, Apple also updated the lightning port to USB C. Now, all the modern Macs including the 2018 MacBook Air, the new MacBook Pro’s, the new Mac Mini and every modern Mac had a USB C port as well as the newest iPad.

However, the 2018 iPhones (the iPhone XS), still came with a lightning port. USB type C was no where to be seen on iPhones. Also, here’s the thing, we’ve seen many reports throughout the years that Apple will finally be switching to USB type C, but that never happened. After Apple updated the iPad Pro with USB C in 2018, everyone was pretty much sure that Apple would have to switch to USB C in 2019. But again, after countless reports and even leaks on this, Apple still hasn’t done so. 

So, you might be wondering why? Why is Apple so stubborn when it comes to switching to USB C on the iPhone, whereas on their other devices, they were one of the first tech companies to switch to USB C? It doesn’t make any sense. The reason for that is simple. Revenue.

Unlike USB C, which is an open standard, lightning was fully developed by Apple. Which means that whenever a 3rd party manufacturer wants to make a lightning accessory for the iPhone, or even just a charger or a charging cable, they would need to pay Apple a licensing fee for every single sale that they make. Rather than this being, for example, a 10% fee for every accessory, it is a flat fee of $4, which is a lot!  This is why you cannot find any cheap lightning cables. Because, all the legit ones, the ones approved by Apple which legally they all have to be, all of those manufacturers have to give Apple a $4 cut for every lightning cable or accessory that they sell. According to’ Lifewire’, more than 2.2 billion iPhones have been sold between 2007-2018, out of which 217 million were just in 2018. 

Apple not exactly short of cash these days, but still cashing in on the old connectors.

Apple not exactly short of cash these days, but still cashing in on the old connectors.

Let’s say that 5% of those users buy a 3rd party lightning cable, or a lightning accessory, 3rd party charger or an external battery and so on. That’s already 10.8 million accessories, which would translate to $432 MILLION in revenue from just 3rd party accessories, for Apple, in 2018 alone. If you multiply that by the number of full years Apple has been selling lightning devices for, so 2013-2019 (7 years), that’s already over $3 BILLION in revenue from just licensing lightning.

But, it’s extremely likely that that number is way higher than that. I mean, how many of you have an external battery and how many of those already came with lightning cables in the box?  So there you go. Apple does state “publicly” that the reason why they don’t want to switch is because of consumers having so many lightning accessories but come on Apple, really? 

USB C is already even more widely implemented than lightning is. So the switch to USB C would be even more hassle free than not switching to USB C in the first place. This way, all of your Apple devices would charge with the same charger and the same cable. No need to carry a separate lightning cable just for your iPhone.

Now, the European Union does actually want to implement a law that would require all smartphones, tablets and other portable devices such as laptops, to have a USB C port for charging. This is in order to reduce confusion and also reduce the amount of waste.  This could indeed force Apple to finally switch to USB C, although that might not really be the case. This is because, according to Ming-Chi-Kuo, who’s been an extremely reliable source in terms of upcoming Apple products so far, stated that Apple will be launching a fully wilreess iPhone in 2021. So instead of switching to USB-C, they would skip it entirely and just go fully wireless instead. It’s not just Ming-Chi-Kuo saying this, Barclays analyst Blayne Curtis, who’s had a pretty good track record in the past, stated the same thing. That according to his inside sources, Apple will be releasing at least one iPhone model in 2021, that would remove the lightning port, which could result in the wired earpods being removed from the box entirely. 

We do have two comments here. The first one being that, yes, this does mean that the big 2020 iPhone redesign, the one with the redesigned frame and the new AR tracking capabilities and the smaller notch, will still have lightning. Our second comment is that this is definitely the future. The real question is would it be possible to do in 2021, or is this fully wireless future something that is 5-10 years down the line?

Well, if Apple does indeed remove the lightning port, they would indeed gain a tiny bit more space inside but more importantly, they would have a fully sealed up experience, especially if they decide to embed the speakers under the display like other manufacturers have experimented with. This means that the 2021 iPhones could indeed be extremely water resistant. But, at the same time, the iPhone 11 Pro’s can already withstand a submersion in 4m of water, up to 30min, which is way more than most people would submerge an iPhone into anyway. Besides, water damage isn’t even covered under warranty which is crazy!

If you expect Apple to cover water damage, don’t hold your breath.

If you expect Apple to cover water damage, don’t hold your breath.

If you submerge your smartphone in water, and this applies to any smartphone, even-though water resistance is indeed an advertised feature, if you do happen to have a faulty unit that has a manufacturing defect on the seal and it breaks, you can say goodbye to that phone for good because neither Apple nor Samsung would be helping you. This is because we cannot currently tell how deep in water the phone was when it broke. As soon as we can figure that out, which we should be able to do with the barometer which some phones do actually have, that’s when water resistance should start getting covered by the warranty.

But anyway, going back to a fully wireless iPhone. Is that even doable? Well, all the iPhones from the iPhone 8 onwards do support wireless charging. However, they also support up to 7.5W charging, as opposed to 9-12W like some android phones support. This means that it will take you around three hours or more to fully charge a phone via wireless charging, as opposed to just over an hour with fast wired charging. However, the bigger issue that I currently see with wireless charging, isn’t necessarily the speed but the convenience. 

With a cable, you just plug it in and that’s it. With wireless charging, you need to place your phone on a wireless charging pad, which means that you would not be able to use it in your hand while it’s charging. You can pretty much say goodbye to charging it on the road or charging it via a battery bank unless you have your wireless charger or a wireless charging battery bank with you. But you see, you still won’t be able to charge it in your bag, because the wireless charging battery bank would always need to be physically attached to your phone so yeah it’s a bit of a tricky one.

Now, did you guys know that the Apple Watch also charges wirelessly? Yes, it does come with a magnetic wireless charging connector that automatically attaches to the back of the watch and this is how it charges. We do believe that when Apple does switch to a fully wireless charging solution on the iPhones, they will be doing something similar to what they’ve done on the Apple Watch. A magnetic pad that would automatically snap to the back of the iPhone, which could indeed solve the issue of not being able to use it when it’s charging, or the issue with charging in your bag with a battery bank that could also attach automatically to the iPhone. They may at least have some sort of Apple Watch style cable that would then magnetically attach to the iPhone, again, just like on the Apple Watch.

This way, Apple could still license that magnetic wireless charging pad to 3rd parties and trust me, they could charge way more than $4 per unit for that and make billions by doing so. So the only problem that’s left to solve is…the speed. Luckily, there is a possible solution to that. While Apple only supports 7.5W wireless charging, VIVO have announced a concept phone, which is actually a fully working device, that supports 60W Wireless Charging!  Apparently you can fully charge it in just 20 minutes, which is even faster than the fastest wired charging out there, that’s nuts! 

A glimpse into the future of Smartphones? Click the image for a full look at vivo’s APEX 2020.

A glimpse into the future of Smartphones? Click the image for a full look at vivo’s APEX 2020.

This specific phone for example, the Vivo Apex 2020, also has no ports at all, it charges just via wireless charging and has a lens with true optical zoom, the lenses themselves actually move in order to magnify the image. This phone also has a front facing camera module that’s under the display itself. So this is truly truly revolutionary and could be similar to what Apple could do in 2021. An iPhone with no notch at all, full wireless charging and a full-screen display with zero interruptions on the front. However, we only have two sources reporting on this (Ming-Chi Kuo and Blayne Curtis from Barclays). Albeit both with a very good track record in the past, but still only two sources. Well not anymore, because 9to5mac has found some pretty massive feature in iOS 13.4 beta.  Apparently there is a mention of a wireless iOS recovery mode, which should be implemented in the very near future. At the moment, if you want to restore an iPhone or reinstall iOS, you need to have it connected to a Mac. But now, you would be able to do this completely wirelessly, without the need to connect it to anything. 

So there you go, another hint that Apple is indeed considering switching to a fully wireless iPhone in the near future!